Pages
Categories
- 2008 Auto Crisis
- Auto Shows
- Awards
- CAFE
- Car reviews
- Corporate News
- Dealers
- Engines
- Executives and Management
- fuel economy
- Future Plans
- Gas Price
- Government
- Historical Info
- Hybrids
- Industry Sales
- introduction rental
- Manufacturing
- Marketing & Advertising
- New Features
- New Product Introduction
- OEM Ownership
- Pricing
- Quality
- Regulation
- Safety
- Sales Incentives
- tax
- Tires
- Toyota Quality Problems
- Uncategorized
Recent Posts
- Old Car Brochures
- Akerson Testifies in Congress on Chevrolet Volt Safety
- Volts OK to Drive, says Government
- 2012 Detroit Auto Show
- Chicago Auto Show - Camaro ZL1
Recommended Links
Archives
- January 2012
- February 2011
- January 2011
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- January 2008
- January 2007
- January 2006
- January 2005
- January 2004
Meta
Chrysler-Fiat Alliance - A New Twist
24th February 2009
The proposed alliance between Chrysler and Fiat is full of controversy. First, there was the outrage that Fiat would get 35% of Chrysler for no cash or other assets. Then the gods of the Potomac decided that they couldn’t let a foreign automaker take control of Chrysler after Chrysler took the loans from the US taxpayers. Fiat would get “control” by exercising its right under the agreement to claim an additional 20% of Chrysler (total would then be 55% for you math whizzes). Never mind that that’s exactly what needs to happen for Chrysler to be “viable” - the main requirement of the loans. Why let actual facts get in the way of good political theater? As automotive mergers go, this one is a great match, as I have already written.
Today’s lesson is on the global auto industry and its many intertwined relationships. Virtually all automakers are related to many others, sometimes in ways that you might not have guessed. What if I told you that a potential beneficiary of the Chrysler-Fiat deal is none other than Chrysler’s Dearborn friend - Ford Motor Company? Ford has made public its plan to begin producing some of its European small cars here in North America. Production of the Expedition and Navigator SUVs has moved to Kentucky to make room for small car production at its Wayne, Michigan facility. Fiesta for North American customers will be produced at Ford’s Cuautitlán Assembly Plant beginning in early 2010. But there is one European car that Ford might like to sell here, but the volume would never support it - the Ka, Ford’s mini-compact entry in Europe. Ka is very popular in Europe, but has always been considered too small for US tastes. At the introduction of the new Ka in Paris last October (while gas prices were still high), Ford CEO Alan Mulally said, “I think the Ka could work in the US - the question is the volume.” The new Ka, by the way, is based on the Fiat 500 and is built alongside the 500 in Fiat’s plant in Poland.
Now along comes the Chrysler-Fiat alliance. From the beginning, what Fiat expected to get out of the deal is access to Chrysler’s excess assembly capacity and dealer network. The 500 is expected to be one of the
products that they would sell here. If the alliance goes through, and Fiat does produce the 500 for North American sales, it would be relatively simple to add production of the Ka as well. Fiat would have a better business case for the 500 and Ford would be able to add the Ka to its North American lineup with minimal investment. Ford would also not need to push more than the customers want to buy (read: add rebates). They could (”gasp”) produce the amount actually demanded by customers!
Chrysler certainly had no intention of helping Ford with their proposed alliance with Fiat, but that’s the nature of the modern global auto industry.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.









