Pages
Categories
- 2008 Auto Crisis
- Auto Shows
- Awards
- CAFE
- Car reviews
- Corporate News
- Dealers
- Engines
- Executives and Management
- fuel economy
- Future Plans
- Gas Price
- Government
- Historical Info
- Hybrids
- Industry Sales
- introduction rental
- Manufacturing
- Marketing & Advertising
- New Features
- New Product Introduction
- OEM Ownership
- Pricing
- Quality
- Regulation
- Safety
- Sales Incentives
- tax
- Tires
- Toyota Quality Problems
- Uncategorized
Recent Posts
- Old Car Brochures
- Akerson Testifies in Congress on Chevrolet Volt Safety
- Volts OK to Drive, says Government
- 2012 Detroit Auto Show
- Chicago Auto Show - Camaro ZL1
Recommended Links
Archives
- January 2012
- February 2011
- January 2011
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- January 2008
- January 2007
- January 2006
- January 2005
- January 2004
Meta
Saab Story
18th December 2009
Pontiac, Saturn and now Saab. Can Hummer be far behind? I’m not talking about brands that GM has decided are not “core” anymore, but those that are going or out of business in the last several months. Pontiac was supposed to become a niche brand, and then the government told GM to shut it down. Saturn was supposed to be sold to Roger Penske, and when that fell through, GM decided to just shut it down. Now Saab will have a similar fate. Saab was supposed to be sold to Koenigsegg, a Swedish producer of exotic sports cars. That fell through, and then GM sold some of Saab’s assets to Beijing Automotive (BAIC) this week. Word came out that GM was working with Spyker on a deal for the rest of Saab. Today, GM made the announcement below.
Detroit. General Motors announced today that the intended sale of Saab Automobile AB would not be concluded. After the withdrawal of Koenigsegg Group AB last month, GM had been in discussions with Spyker Cars about its interest in acquiring Saab. During the due diligence, certain issues arose that both parties believe could not be resolved. As a result, GM will start an orderly wind-down of Saab operations.
“Despite the best efforts of all involved, it has become very clear that the due diligence required to complete this complex transaction could not be executed in a reasonable time. In order to maintain operations, Saab needed a quick resolution,” said GM Europe President Nick Reilly. “We regret that we were not able to complete this transaction with Spyker Cars. We will work closely with the Saab organization to wind down the business in an orderly and responsible manner. This is not a bankruptcy or forced liquidation process. Consequently, we expect Saab to satisfy debts including supplier payments, and to wind down production and the distribution channel in an orderly manner while looking after our customers.”
Saab will continue to honor warranties, while providing service and spare parts to current Saab owners around the world.
As part of its efforts to become a leaner organization, GM began seeking a buyer for Saab’s operations in January. Last week, Saab Automobile AB announced that it had closed on the sale of certain Saab 9-3, current 9-5 and powertrain technology and tooling to Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings Co. Ltd. (BAIC). GM expects today’s announcement to have no impact on the earlier sale.
As the company continues to reinvent itself, GM has been faced with some very difficult but necessary business decisions. The focus will remain on the four core brands – Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC – and several regional brands, including Opel / Vauxhall in Europe. This will enable the company to devote more engineering and marketing resources to each brand and model.
You have to wonder what was the hurry? GM has only referred to a December 31 deadline to get a deal done. That sure seems like an artificial/meaningless/arbitrary date, which is fine - it’s their business to run as they please. Just spare us the self-imposed emergency.
That’s what I think - how about you? Please leave your comments below.
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.







